Table of Contents
The belt sanders are very aggressive in the sanding domain, they can easily remove all those nicks and scratches and flatten the wood very quickly. In this article, I’ve shortlisted 3 best belt sanders in the market from each segment.
Best Premium Sander: Makita 9903
Features
- Powerful 8.8 AMP motor; only 85dB
- Variable speed control dial (690-1,440 ft./min.) enables user to match the speed to the application
- Auto-tracking belt system tracks belt without adjustment
- Innovative design for sanding flush to wall with nose and side of sander
- Front grip design for comfortable operation
- Dust bag for a cleaner work environment
- Long 16.4 ft. power cord for easier maneuverability
Best Value for Money Sander: BLACK+DECKER DS321 Dragster
Features
- 7.0 amps of power for maximum performance
- Three-position adjustable handle provides comfort in different orientations
- Low-profile design with extended reach for maximum functionality
- Flush body design allows for sanding against vertical surfaces
Best Affordable Sander: TACKLIFE Belt Sander
Features
- Comes with 13pcs sanding belts, 7 x 80 grits, 6 x 120 grits
- 2 In 1: Bench & Belt Sander – Provided with two metal screw clamps, TACKLIFE belt sander can be turned over and fixed to table, acting as a bench sander, lock-on button helps to free your hand, providing more convenience and flexibility.
- Come with 6pcs 120 grits and 7pcs 80 grits aluminum oxide sanding belts, saving your money, meeting the requirements for your different projects. Metal clamping lever for easy and quick sanding belt change.
- 5 Amp motor offers great power to the sanding surface, delivering efficient removal and high quality finish. Variable-speed knob with 6 dials enables you to match the best speed to the application from 0-560rpm.
- The dust collecting box is detachable, can be easily installed and removed, easy to clean dust. Two vacuum dust adapters, 32mm and 35mm make it possible to connect your vacuum cleaner, reaching the perfect dust collection effect.
Leave a Reply